Market Intelligence › Institutions › Comerica Bank

Comerica Bank holds $61.3B in deposits across 41 counties in 16 ranked markets and 5 states. Its deposit footprint is concentrated: the top three counties (Wayne County, Oakland County, Los Angeles County) hold 56% of its deposits, and Michigan accounts for 59% of the total. It ranks among the three largest institutions in 4 of the 41 counties where it operates.

Deposit footprint

Total Deposits

$61.3B

June 30, 2025, nominal

Counties

where it holds deposits

Branches

354

reported offices

Ranked Markets

CSAs / MSAs touched

Identifying and Recruiting the Right People

Deposit share data tends to track where commercial client relationships, and the bankers who hold them, are concentrated. We help banks building or entering competitive markets recruit the people who have those relationships.

See how we help banks recruit commercial banking talent

Deposits by county

Data as of June 30, 2025 (FDIC Summary of Deposits)

	County	Deposits	County’s % of Bank’s Deposits	Bank’s % of County Deposits	Branches
1.	Wayne County, MI	$22.4B	36.5%	29.4%	42
2.	Oakland County, MI	$6.4B	10.5%	7.7%	41
3.	Los Angeles County, CA	$5.8B	9.4%	1.2%	24
4.	Santa Clara County, CA	$4.7B	7.7%	3.0%	13
5.	Dallas County, TX	$4.2B	6.9%	1.5%	32
6.	Macomb County, MI	$3.6B	5.9%	17.3%	24
7.	Harris County, TX	$2.7B	4.4%	0.9%	32
8.	San Francisco County, CA	$982M	1.6%	0.3%	1
9.	Orange County, CA	$980M	1.6%	0.6%	9
10.	Washtenaw County, MI	$836M	1.4%	7.1%	6
11.	Travis County, TX	$820M	1.3%	1.6%	8
12.	Santa Cruz County, CA	$750M	1.2%	9.7%	6
13.	Kent County, MI	$632M	1.0%	2.6%	7
14.	Maricopa County, AZ	$533M	0.9%	0.3%	12
15.	Contra Costa County, CA	$457M	0.7%	0.9%	3
16.	Jackson County, MI	$457M	0.7%	19.8%	4
17.	Collin County, TX	$416M	0.7%	1.0%	9
18.	San Diego County, CA	$414M	0.7%	0.3%	12
19.	Livingston County, MI	$382M	0.6%	9.1%	3
20.	Tarrant County, TX	$348M	0.6%	0.6%	8
21.	Ingham County, MI	$340M	0.6%	3.5%	4
22.	Fort Bend County, TX	$320M	0.5%	1.6%	4
23.	Monterey County, CA	$288M	0.5%	2.5%	3
24.	Palm Beach County, FL	$275M	0.4%	0.4%	4
25.	Kalamazoo County, MI	$252M	0.4%	5.5%	5
26.	Muskegon County, MI	$225M	0.4%	10.6%	4
27.	Calhoun County, MI	$223M	0.4%	16.5%	2
28.	Alameda County, CA	$221M	0.4%	0.3%	5
29.	Kerr County, TX	$194M	0.3%	11.5%	2
30.	San Mateo County, CA	$164M	0.3%	0.4%	5
31.	Bexar County, TX	$132M	0.2%	0.1%	5
32.	Eaton County, MI	$124M	0.2%	6.8%	1
33.	Midland County, MI	$110M	0.2%	8.6%	1
34.	Broward County, FL	$107M	0.2%	0.2%	1
35.	San Bernardino County, CA	$104M	0.2%	0.3%	3
36.	Montgomery County, TX	$99M	0.2%	0.6%	2
37.	Denton County, TX	$47M	0.1%	0.0%	2
38.	Williamson County, TX	$45M	0.1%	0.4%	2
39.	Ventura County, CA	$39M	0.1%	0.2%	1
40.	Galveston County, TX	$34M	0.1%	0.5%	1
41.	Brazoria County, TX	$20M	0.0%	0.3%	1

Deposits are as reported to the FDIC at branch level, June 30, 2025, and are nominal. “County’s % of Bank’s Deposits” is this county’s share of the institution’s total deposits; “Bank’s % of County Deposits” is this institution’s deposits as a percent of all deposits booked in that county. Counties within a Combined or Metropolitan Statistical Area link to their full profile; other counties are shown for completeness.

All 293 markets and the 1,533 counties within a CSA or MSA are covered in the Market Intelligence resource. See the methodology for how each figure is built and when to expect updates.